Glad you like it, I was actually a bit embarrased, as it (my customization) could use some polish.
No real ISP stuff, aside from the integration of Webmail and community content feeds. I certainly look forward to the day when I actually have something that is worth giving back :) I still have alot of work to do. >>Brendan ----- Original Message ----- From: "todd tredeau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [opinion] Re: Jetspeed for professional sites; Is it ready > NICE... REALLY Nice.. what sort of "isp" related jetspeed stuff have you > done....anything we can use?? > > todd > > > Brendan O'Bra wrote: > > >Ok... I'll jump in from deep lurker mode to "defend" jetspeed, as it has > >served me well thus far... > > > >I use jetspeed on my website (I'm an ISP). We are 100% open source, linux, > >tomcat, jetspeed. > > > >http://www.pvbb.net > > > >So far, jetspeed has been very flexible and we are happy with it. I will > >say that the fact that I am a java developer has made it easy to work with. > > > >>>Brendan > >>> > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Haresh Gujarathi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 10:13 AM > >Subject: RE: [opinion] Re: Jetspeed for professional sites; Is it ready > > > > > >>Hi Todd, > >> > >>Its a assuring sign that people like you are devoted to the open source > >>momentum. > >> > >>But I will say u are not getting my point. > >> > >>This discussion is not to criticize the Jetspeed development. But is to > >> > >find > > > >>out if > >>a. the Jetspeed can really be used in the production environment > >>b. it has sufficient basic features to be spent time and effort by > >> > >companies > > > >>like mine to deploy business sites for clients. > >> > >>Look we do not have time and resources to do experiment ourselves and > >> > >later > > > >>figure out that the product is too immature. > >>That is why I sent out the mail to ask people if they have deployed some > >>sensible sites on net. > >> > >>I do not understand what portal you are running... When I checked back > >> > >your > > > >>another posting, > >>I suppose you must be referring to http://portal.wisernet.com and > >>http://portal.wiserlabz.com > >>I do not see why these sites are great; I just do not see any content. I > >> > >do > > > >>not see any channels into it. They are totally useless as example to > >> > >assure > > > >>community that there are some meaningful sites using Jetspeed. > >> > >>Except for http://qld.ieaust.org.au/jetspeed I have not seen any > >> > >meaningful > > > >>deployment of jetspeed. > >>That is why I have doubts about its readiness for the business "as of > >>today". I am sure it will be ready tomorrow. > >> > >>I hope my reading to be wrong. Because if Jetspeed can be meaningfully > >> > >used > > > >>today, I would like to use it for my clients web sites. So please correct > >> > >me > > > >>if anybody things that way. > >> > >>regards, > >> > >>Haresh > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: todd tredeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:55 AM > >>To: Jetspeed Users List > >>Subject: [opinion] Re: Jetspeed for professional sites; Is it ready > >> > >> > >>I guess you guys miss the point... I think discussion is great, as long > >>as the purpose if for moving the product forward, adding needed input... > >>There is lots of great software out there. There are lots of great > >>programmers from many countries with different perspectives. > >> > >>1. You can suggest what you need (and can't write) > >>2. You can suggest / show what other people are doing and have done. > >>3. You can contribute, to improve the product, make suggestions, etc. > >> > >>Jetspeed, is in reality truly what is great about the #1 Web Server in > >>the business, the combined minds of thousands (sometimes just dozens or > >>fewer) very hard working dedicated people. Open Source Software works... > >> > >>Sometimes our thoughts are poor, disorganized (mine are) but here is > >>what I see (as a non programmer) that I MUST have for a 100% go... Keep > >>in mind, Jetspeed is a great idea, and it is a "work in progress", not a > >>debate.. > >> > >>I would like to see the following aspects addressed in Jetspeed, and am > >>willing to spend the time with willing programmers to get there.. are you? > >> > >> Configuration Routine (usually you have to write this last) as the > >>program changes to much and > >> too fast... along these lines I have great ideas.. > >> > >> Adding Content "portlets" at will...including; > >> date content starts > >> date content stops > >> content creation (There are a number of nice xml publishing > >>packages out there, either write one or make a jetspeed modified version > >>of one) End Users can't do it. > >> > >> Calander, ya that would be cool, but.... how about somethiing really > >>cool, voting, yes, but again, I would like to take it a few steps > >>further.. who is up to the challenge? > >> > >> To demonstrate my committment to this project I run 2 portals 24 x > >>7, and work very hard to promote "good" software of all types. > >> > >>Lets have fun > >> > >>todd > >>waiting to work with programmers > >> > >>Frans Thamura wrote: > >> > >>>No, i think i will use jetspeed in seriously, but, sad man, all the > >>> > >source > > > >>>is not documented well, and a lot of big question and little bit > >>> > >crowded.. > > > >>>There is a software eBdesk.com create by someone in my country, it is > >>>popular enough.. here...but they approach for corporate portal.. > >>> > >>>my solution is for executive information system.. > >>> > >>>sorry, i will prepare to put my sample work in the net, but still get a > >>> > >lot > > > >>>of BIG QUESTION... > >>> > >>>so, if you want to try implement Jetspeed, prepare for the hurt oke.. > >>> > >>>Frans > >>> > >>> > >>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>From: "Haresh Gujarathi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>To: "Jetspeed Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:31 PM > >>>Subject: RE: Jetspeed for professional sites; Is it ready? > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hi Frans, > >>>> > >>>>1. Can I see on net some of your sites using jetspeed? > >>>>2. Now that you are aware of the issues in implementing a portal for > >>>>companies, have you found any other alternative? > >>>>(cheaper preferrably) ? > >>>> > >>>>-- haresh > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Frans Thamura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:44 PM > >>>>To: Jetspeed Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>Subject: Re: Jetspeed for professional sites; Is it ready? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Hi haresh, > >>>> > >>>>>1. How is Jetspeed for deploying a serious business site (if not > >>>>> > >mission > > > >>>>>critical one ?) > >>>>> > >>>>I think for basic personalization is oke, but for multi tab or folder, i > >>>>think you will got the difficulty, esp for desigining the complex > >>>>portlet/psml > >>>> > >>>>i try to implement this in several company, yah we got a performance > >>>>problem, slow... > >>>> > >>>>I create a business intelligence system based on Jetspeed, called > >>>> > >cockpit > > > >>>>system , it is a balance scorecard system.. > >>>> > >>>>>2. Are there any sites built using Jetspeed ? (other than the ones > >>>>> > >>>>specified > >>>> > >>>>>on the Jetspeed home page) > >>>>> > >>>>see in the reference of jakarta.apache.org/jetspeed > >>>> > >>>>>3. Has anyone implemented > >>>>> > >>>>>chat, discussion forums, polls, as portlets? (etc required to build a > >>>>>portal...) > >>>>> > >>>>I try poll, but forum, get difficulty to implement this.. integration > >>>> > >>>single > >>> > >>>>login problem > >>>> > >>>>>4. How to provide roll based access to the sub sections of the Jetspeed > >>>>>sites? > >>>>>For example, If I want to assign 4 different administrators to 4 > >>>>> > >>>different > >>> > >>>>>sections of a community portal (children, young_minds, adults, senior > >>>>>citizens), so that those 4 people are responsible for managing the > >>>>> > >>>content > >>> > >>>>>published in the corresponding sections. > >>>>> > >>>>>Basically this is a content management system facility... which I think > >>>>> > >>>>can > >>>> > >>>>>be an integral part of the Portal system > >>>>> > >>>>>Is anybody working on such (Admin) portlet? > >>>>> > >>>>yah you can try it with admin/jetspeed user > >>>> > >>>>but, there is a role tag in xreg. if you implement it you will see the > >>>> > >>>role > >>> > >>>>based portlet. > >>>> > >>>>i create several roles in my jetspeed environment, this is a business > >>>>intelligence system, and work well.. even you must find a trick to > >>>> > >>>implement > >>> > >>>>this.. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>have a nice try.. > >>>> > >>>>Frans > >>>> > >>>>>regards > >>>>> > >>>>>Haresh > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>_________________________________________________________ Do You > >>>> > >Yahoo!? > > > >>>>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > >>>>-- > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>> > >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>>> > >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>_________________________________________________________ > >>> > >>>Do You Yahoo!? > >>> > >>>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>-- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>> > >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>> > >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > >> > ><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
