Angel,

         While this is a fine goal in theory, for both personal and financial 
reasons it will not happen in practice.  Were I in the position Mr. Damery is 
in I would probably be doing the same thing.  And I say the following without a 
trace of snarkery toward him or his skills, because I've been in parallel 
situations, but one does what one must for the "Dog and Pony Shows," which is 
precisely what many of us call trade shows.  You become incredibly proficient 
at what you need to be when it's needed for practical reasons.  I had a good 
friend who was 100% hearing, but her partner was 100% deaf, and she was one of 
the best signers I've known.  She used to pride herself, and justifiably, on 
the fact that deaf individuals would insist that she could not possibly be 
hearing and be able to sign like she could.  She literally fooled them (not 
intentionally, mind you) into believing she was deaf simply because of her 
fluency and depth of vocabulary in sign.

          I am almost slack-jawed at the idea that anyone sighted could ever 
become good with tactile reading of Braille.  I could actually visually read 
Braille, at least at the word level, upside down and backwards (literally) when 
I was doing drill work with some of my students when I worked at the Virginia 
School for the Deaf and the Blind.  There was no embosser that did a cheat I 
would have loved to have had, with the actual letters printed alongside the 
Braille embossing.  But I learned as much as I could in the context where I had 
to use it so that I knew whether or not I was getting the answers I was 
supposed to be getting.

Brian

Reply via email to