Hi David, Keep in mind that as a new release of a screen reader comes out, it may leap frog the competition for a while. Let's see how well JFW 3.3 works with IE5, and then I think some conclusions can be drawn. This isn't taking anything away from Window-Eyes; it's great that it apparently works well in IE5; it didn't in IE4, particularly in the extremely slow response to loading of pages, and that point was acknowledged by GW Micro. I'm confident that JFW will work very well with IE5. Notice that HJ states that they do not officially support IE5 yet. That, to me is significant. Best Regards, Les - Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
- [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and JFW's In... David Poehlman
- Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and... Charles Lott
- Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes... Gordon Kent
- Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Window... chris cant
- Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Wi... David Poehlman
- Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Window... Michael Seelig
- Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and... David Scrimenti
- Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes... Lynn Schneider
- RE: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes... Les Kriegler
- RE: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and... Clive Lansink
- Re: [Fwd: Fwd: A comparative review of Windoweyes and... Harry Bassler