>
>
> It's funny -- you quickly jumped to call me close minded and homophobic
> without really considering what I'm saying.  I admit that I'm not gay, and I
> don't understand the politics.  I admit that I have more conservative
> values.  And I even admitted that I might be getting old and stuck in my
> ways.
>
> Perhaps if you'd stop racing to call me names, you could slow down and see
> my point.  Homosexuals want to be accepted in a world where more than 90% of
> the population (actually, 97%) are heterosexual -- gays want "heteros" to
> understand their viewpoints, and to acknowledge their rights to marry
> publicly and raise children and have shared legal benefits.

Before you jump to being so patronizing, I suggest you read carefully what people 
write:
This is what I wrote:

"comments like this only add to the impression of homophobia that is quite strong in 
your
posts regarding this matter.
For someone who is convinced he is not homophobic you give a very good impression.

Concern confined to the children would have left the other stuff about the lesbianism, 
the

gay community etc out of it.
There are none so blind as those the refuse to see."

No where have I called you names nor accused you of having a closed mind.
As I am jnot the only one who has responded to you, why am I the only one you are
responding to?( at least as far as my mail box shows me)



>
>
> But, when it comes to making a minor attempt to understand why a "hetero"
> like me might have a different viewpoint, forget it.  Just call me a
> homophobe and be done with it.  And then call ME close minded.
>
> And, if you think I am homophobic, you'd better stay out of the deep South
> and Utah, Buddy!
>
> I keep learning more and more about different lifestyles -- and this list
> has been helpful.  I appreciate the discourse, even some of the more peppery
> stuff.
>
> Regards,
>
> Harper Lou

--
bw
colin

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geocities.com/tantra_apso/index.html


Reply via email to