On Jul 11, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
C'mon guys - I'm not asking you to do _anything_. There is literally
NOTHING that you have to do. It already works! It enables more
end-users! Why on earth would you want to shut this down when there
are _NO_ negative effects? I just don't get that. Just use it and
be
happy! Why can't you let me have this? :)
Why can't your contract pay you to implement an SLF4J -> Acme Co
logging adapter? Seems like they would then get more bang for their
buck as it would be applicable to other projects as well.
I agree - SLF4J and commons-logging ARE logging abstractions. We
don't need a logging abstraction on top of a logging abstraction on
top of a logging framework...
