If you use JSecurity in a cell phone, would you like it if you were forced to incorporate a logging framework that you had no use for and just wanted to use the phone's logging capabilities directly?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Jeremy Haile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jul 11, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >> >>> C'mon guys - I'm not asking you to do _anything_. There is literally >>> NOTHING that you have to do. It already works! It enables more >>> end-users! Why on earth would you want to shut this down when there >>> are _NO_ negative effects? I just don't get that. Just use it and be >>> happy! Why can't you let me have this? :) >> >> Why can't your contract pay you to implement an SLF4J -> Acme Co logging >> adapter? Seems like they would then get more bang for their buck as it >> would be applicable to other projects as well. > > I agree - SLF4J and commons-logging ARE logging abstractions. We don't need > a logging abstraction on top of a logging abstraction on top of a logging > framework... > > >
