Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Jeremy Haile wrote:
I do feel like we are spending undue amounts of time discussing a
logging implementation, rather than addressing the serious holes in
JSecurity's security implementation, unit tests, and documentation.
In my opinion, those are much more worthy of heated debate and much
more worthy of our time. Hence I think the faster we can get through
the logging issue and on to important issues, the better.
I know what you mean but, this is the ASF way. Things need to be
discussed and a consensus reached. I know that it's agonizing for the
committers but this is what brings in the community participation, if
they feel that then can contribute. After all, this is why you've
come here to incubate at the ASF, no?
+1 to what Alan says. I
mentioned a vote but if no consensus is reached, you will get -1, and
this is certainly not what you want :)
A vote is much more a way to state that the concensus has been reached.
Last not least, we are all having strong positions, but it's more
important to understand why others don't share them. Sometime its better
to make compromises on small things than to stand on principles, for the
good of the community.
And as a touch of humor, as a friend told me once : "this is not because
we disagree that you are right" :)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
