Alex Karasulu wrote:
I know what you mean but, this is the ASF way. Things need to be
discussed and a consensus reached. I know that it's agonizing for the
committers but this is what brings in the community participation, if they
feel that then can contribute. After all, this is why you've come here to
incubate at the ASF, no?
+1 to what Alan says. I
mentioned a vote but if no consensus is reached, you will get -1, and this
is certainly not what you want :)
Nothing wrong with a -1. No one should fear vetos. I view a veto as a
queue telling us we need to talk before doing anything more. Just a flag
for me. I like to see a project exercise veto resolution in the incubator.
Just shows how well the project is doing.
+1. I just meant that getting a -1 because of a premature vote is a sign
that the discussion was not pushed to a point we almost reach a consensus.
If no consensus can be reached, anyway, going for a vote is just a way
to get a clear status and stop the endless discussion :) Sometime words
hurt more than vote ...
And as a touch of humor, as a friend told me once : "this is not because we
disagree that you are right" :)
hehehe - you mean that I'm always right!
I don't disagree ... does it mean I'm right too ? ;)
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
