When I reviewed the other companies using the phrase JSecurity, I
didn't think any of them posed a trademark conflict with JSecurity.
Of course I'm not a lawyer, but I definitely support pushing this to
the Apache legal team and getting a firm answer on whether or not
JSecurity is problematic before we decide to change the name.
I am also of the opinion that JSecurity is still the best name on the
table.
Jeremy
On Nov 26, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Craig wrote:
I am only a user, but I agree with the last statement. Personally,
I much prefer the JSecurity name to the other options presented.
And I must admit I am a bit confused at this point... a google
search of other names like Alcatraz seems to reveal several
companies and security related products - not much different than
you get searching for JSecurity.
What is it that makes the name Alcatraz less dangerous than JSecurity?
Craig
On Nov 25, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Brad Whitaker wrote:
Fort is pretty funny. I can't imagine anyone who grew up in the USA
being able to say Apache Fort. I'm sure it would always come out as
Fort Apache.
I like Alcatraz best among the recent suggestions. (I think it is
unfortunate that JSecurity is being abandoned.)
