I thought the Intermediate Java for Programmers in TE I was excellent (except for the inability to print out the slides so I can use them anywhere rather than just my computer).
Unfortunately, I haven'yt had any takers on my new Java expertise along with my experience in complex software development. So, it's been a year and I've forgotten much of what I learned as I head into C#... But, Stu was great, informative, and easy to learn from. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart Halloway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Research Triangle Java User's Group mailing list." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [Juglist] TechEngage III > The Java curriculum could certainly be better! It would be nice to see > more people from the JUG addressing curriculum deficiencies instead of > just pointing them out. TechEngage is a very small volunteer operation, > and there is a lot of room to jump in and contribute. > > Employers are much more interested in hiring people who, after > identifying problems, *solve* them. > > Stu Halloway > > > > Also, at least in the first year, the published Java curriculum was > > unappealing compared to the .Net one. And a lot fewer sessions were > > scheduled. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Juglist mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org _______________________________________________ Juglist mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://trijug.org/mailman/listinfo/juglist_trijug.org
