Hi Serge, Are you able to ping your Cisco router's FF80 address? Yes I can ping both the link local address and the manually assigned address.
What do you see if you run "monitor interface traffic fe-0/1/0" while you run your pings? The captured output seems okay (I have tried with tcpdump from shell mode too..) 22:02:36.895648 Out IP6 fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f > fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400: ICMP6, echo request, seq 44, length 16 22:02:36.896282 In IP6 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 > fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 44, length 16 22:02:37.895555 Out IP6 fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f > fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400: ICMP6, echo request, seq 45, length 16 22:02:37.896414 In IP6 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 > fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 45, length 16 22:02:38.896466 Out IP6 fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f > fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400: ICMP6, echo request, seq 46, length 16 22:02:38.901718 In IP6 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 > fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 46, length 16 22:06:06.206997 In IP6 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 > fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f: ICMP6, neighbor advertisment, tgt is fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400, length 24 22:06:06.529913 In IP fe1-1.beetle.subisu.net.np > OSPF-ALL.MCAST.NET: OSPFv2, Hello, length 60 22:06:06.865791 In IP6 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 > fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f, length 32 22:06:06.865867 Out IP6 fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f > fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400: ICMP6, neighbor advertisment[|icmp6] 22:06:06.866165 Out IP6 fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f > fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400: ICMP6, echo request, seq 6, length 16 22:06:06.866752 In IP6 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 > fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 6, length 16 22:06:07.866094 Out IP6 fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f > fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400: ICMP6, echo request, seq 7, length 16 22:06:07.866812 In IP6 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 > fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 7, length 16 22:06:08.866000 Out IP6 fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f > fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400: ICMP6, echo request, seq 8, length 16 22:06:08.866736 In IP6 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 > fe80::217:cbff:fe77:1f: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 8, length 16 Do you have any neighbors picked up by ND (show ipv6 neighbors)? V6 neighbors are discovering : IPv6 Address Linklayer Address State Exp Rtr Interface abcd:3800:1:1::2 00:18:73:46:12:32 stale 797 yes ge-0/0/0.0 abcd:3800:2:1::2 00:0c:31:95:a4:00 stale 345 yes fe-0/1/0.0 fe80::202:17ff:fed8:4c00 00:02:17:d8:4c:00 stale 57 yes ge-0/0/0.0 fe80::20c:31ff:fe95:a400 00:0c:31:95:a4:00 stale 224 yes fe-0/1/0.0 fe80::218:73ff:fe46:1232 00:18:73:46:12:32 stale 152 yes ge-0/0/0.0 Do you have any Firewall Filters attached to Loop0 that would block some traffic? yes, I have applied a firewall filter policy on Lo0 to filter some specific tcp/udp services rest are accepted. I am not sure if it is a Licensing problem, I have not found any related doc on the web too.. Chris, This is my productions box, so I can restart the rpd process only on our regular maintains day. thank you, Ramesh On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Chris Grundemann <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 09:59, Serge Vautour <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is very odd. The "OSPF instance is not running" message makes me > wonder if there's a licensing problem. I haven't been able to find anything > on the Juniper web site... > > There should be no issue with licensing - IPv6 has been a standard > feature in Junos for quite some time. I don't have any experience with > 9.2R2 on an M10i specifically though - I guess it is possible there is > a bug... > > > > > Are you able to ping your Cisco router's FF80 address? What do you see if > you run "monitor interface traffic fe-0/1/0" while you run your pings? Do > you have any neighbors picked up by ND (show ipv6 neighbors)? Do you have > any Firewall Filters attached to Loop0 that would block some traffic? > > Good ideas. > > Also, is this a production or lab box Ramesh? if it's a lab box you > might try restarting rpd - these problems seem to be quite odd indeed > (from what I can tell you are configuring things properly). > > > > > HTH, > > Serge > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > -- > @ChrisGrundemann > weblog.chrisgrundemann.com > www.burningwiththebush.com > www.coisoc.org > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
