Il giorno Thu, 4 Jul 2019 15:19:15 +0530 Bhushan Shah <bs...@mykolab.com> ha scritto:
> - No they can't because it makes life of other developer harder > - No they can't because it makes life of other user harder - No they can't because it creates inconsistencies and makes some user-facing tools like drkonqi useless with people that don't use Bugzilla. - No they can't because then it's going to get hard for both users *and* downstreams to find *where* they report their issues given that project X may use Bugzilla and Y might use GitLab > If developer/maintainer collectively thinks that using gitlab as bug > tracker makes their life easier instead of depending on bugzilla I And what about making existing tools useless? No, the fact that project X doesn't use them is not an excuse. It may be valid *at this point in time* only. > specific sub-community, that decision doesn't affect krita, okular or > other KDE applications. It does, see above why. As a downstream I don't want to chase the projects to see which platform they use for reporting bugs. And yes, I have direct experience professionally with another, unrelated FOSS project (Bioconductor) which doesn't have a "central" bug reporting infrastructure and leaves to the maintainers how to get their reports: it's an absolute hell to wade through. I don't want to see this in KDE. > In general, I respect everyone's personal opinion that bugzilla at > moment superior to the gitlab issues, but at same time I also want to > respect other developers opinion/choices as long as they abide by the I see nothing that allows an informed decision. Why is not Bugzilla acceptable? Why is GL better? No, familiarity and onboarding reasons are not enough. Please at least try to outline first the advantages and disadvantages of both.
Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP