begin  quoting Tracy R Reed as of Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 02:42:08PM -0800:
> Stewart Stremler wrote:
> >>That would make sense if all countries agreed to respect human rights
> >>and freedom.  No other country has as strong a history in this area
> >>as US.
> > 
> > What color is the sky in your world?
> 
> He never said the US was perfect. I think the implication is that we are
> better than a lot of others in this area.

Dunno. At the moment, no. Before fifty years ago? Probably not as well.

I would think the Netherlands (at least) would give us a run for our money.

>                                           This seems to be a constant
> problem in these sort of debates. "Are you saying that GEORGE BUSH is a
> saint?!?!" Uh...no. That's not what he is saying.

Neither am I.
 
Depending on how you view "freedom", you could argue that France has
been chasing the dream just about as long; that the Netherlands do more
of it; etc. etc.

So are we talking *practice*, or are we just talking about how good we 
are at SAYING we are?

> > Besides we're not the _only_ freedom-loving people in the world.  We just
[snip] 
> Everyone claims to love freedom. Even in Vietnam they say they love
> freedom. Even the communists in Vietnam say they love freedom. And many
> of them honestly believe they are free. Of course they only believe that
> because their government run schools and newspapers tell them that.

Yup.

'course, if you replace "Vietnam" with "USA", it *still* works.

> > Imagine if the average american newspaper had a topless woman on page 3.
> 
> It sure would make a lot more young men willing to risk their lives for
> their country! :)
>
> <yakov>Boobies with my headlines? WHAT A COUNTRY!</yakov>

Try again. They'd be shut down. You only get free speech here in carefully
selected topics.

Granted, that range of topics is pretty darn wide.  And I think we do a
pretty good tradeoff in making it all work.  But that's a far cry from
expecting anyone else to think that we do the 'best' job.

> > We need to solve the routing problem.
> 
> Freenet takes the malicious router problem very seriously and does
> everything it can to account for it in their design.

That's not the same thing as saying they solved the problem.

-Stewart "The question is... is it good *enough*?" Stremler


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to