Stewart Stremler wrote:
Yes... and if that path is by way of the exhaust ducting, it's golden!

Still really noisy though. There are sound-resistant ducts which are double-walled. I'd opt for one of those if I were doing this project.

That being said, I could design a (relatively) soundproof box in which to put my computer (or other noisy equipment), but I doubt the effort required in building the double-studded, triple-insulated enclosure would really make up for the meager savings in noise.

That sounds like overkill.

That's how true soundproofing is done, though. In addition to the doublewall construction, you also need two doors. Want to see inside? Double-pane the interior door, and single-pane the exterior. It's those buffers full of air that stop sound, not the solid surfaces. Sound is transmitted more efficiently through solid surfaces than air. It's due to resonance. The ideal design takes into account that resonance and uses it against itself: design your enclosure to minimize vibration while at the same time using inverse harmonic vibration to dampen those vibrations. It's the concept used in dead rooms in recording studios. You'll rarely find 90 degree angles that aren't in some way fitted with traps. Since we don't care about resonance inside the box, just sound escaping outside, 90 degree angles and parallel surfaces aren't really that important a consideration. It's the leakage factor we're worried about. So, we construct doublewall enclosures that only have a small surface area in contact with one another. In between the walls, we line two different densities of foam to deaden vibrations. The third insulation is a cushion of air in between the foam pieces.

Granted, the structure I eluded to above is a bit overkill, but as I tend to over-engineer things and make them solid as a brick shithouse, that's not surprising.

I recall boxes to be used with line and daisy-wheel printers, and they
did a remarkable job in reducing the level of noise.  (From "very
loud" to "a little noisy", mostly. Line printers aren't generally all that quiet.)

Probably doublewall boxes insulated with foam. Much like flight case construction, actually. Those do a decent job

IIRC, they mostly accomplished this with solid construction (nothing
to rattle), baffling (sound-absorbent foam?), and a sort of faceted
shape (no or few parallel surfaces), that I assume was to minimize
resonance.

Yup. About the most inefficient structure to resonate sound is an uneven pentagon. That's a pentagon with no two sides and angles the same length or arc. This is why voice booths are typically in the corners of recording studios :) It's easy to make an uneven pentagon in a corner.

I'm not an audio geek, however, nor did I ever buy one for my own
use (or even consider it).  Real information would be welcome!

I'm an audio geek!

If anyone wants details on how to build a soundproofed enclosure, let me know and I'll draw up some prints.

It might be interesting to build a few different boxes an measure the
output.  How close can you get to a "soundproof" box on the cheap?

For around $50 or so I can build a mostly soundproofed box in which you could house a decent sized computer. It'll take most of an entire 4x8 sheet of 1/4" or 3/8" plywood, three 1x2s, a bottle of wood glue, a drill, counterset, box of #6 screws, a half-sheet of #4 polyurethane foam, and a half-sheet of #1 polyurethane foam ... two sets of cupboard hinges, and a half-sheet of 3/16 plexiglas. Silicone sealant and an epoxy paint would also help tremendously.

The only part that's difficult in this scenario is the venting duct. I'd have to engineer baffles in the back wall to trap the sound. At the same time, i'd be decreasing airflow. I'd also have to engineer some way for air to get in -- much the same problem as before. Oh well, I'll put some thought into it and draw up some plans.

Oh, add to the parts list one fluid bearing, medium-flow 120mm fan, some filter foam, and a finger grille. I'll figure something out for the front vents.

cheers.
-kelsey


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to