John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
>> Has anyone seen terms that don't have such david/goliath discrepancies?
>> Does any provider actually promise to protect your data even in cases of
>> usage disputes? Or to arbitrate disputes? Or anything else more "equal".
> 
> Are you asking about DNS, or about web(data) hosting?
> 
> It looks like with 1and1, you cannot point the WHOIS record to a DNS
> server under your own control.

Umm, I understood it to be an option. You could select the "private" DNS
settings mode, where they "took care of everything" _and_ protected you
from public scrutiny (and provided a proxy email passthrough), or you
could do-it-yourself, if you preferred (and know how).

..j


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to