On Tue, March 27, 2007 11:53 pm, Christian Seberino wrote: > > On Tue, March 27, 2007 4:07 pm, DJA wrote: > >>>> Sex does not biologically require marriage. > >>> The point is not what we can get away with but what is the ideal. > >> Fine. Who gets to define the ideal? You? You have your ideals, I have >> mine. Others have theirs. Which is correct? Given only those three >> cases, all three, and at least two. > > Some would say the ideal of sex in marriage is an ideal *everyone* agrees > with :) Outrageous? Tell me what you think of this exposition on the > topic... > >
Please tell Some for me that he's wrong. -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
