Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > David Looney wrote: > >> I also don't want to be running my own IMAP server (don't want to have >> to be dependent on network connectivity from my laptop, e.g.). > > In what way does the offline mode of Thunderbird fail you?
Two independent facts. 1. I don't want to run my own IMAP server. 2. I want all mail (~3.2 GB currently) to be available. I haven't tried offline mode (1), but it seemed to me the idea was to be selective in folders so designated (hence 2). How do you think IMAP synchronization would rank compared to rsync of mail directories in terms of efficiency ? David Looney -- Remember, never take no cutoffs, and hurry along as fast as you can. - Virginia Reed, Donner party survivor. -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
