Lan Barnes wrote: > Let's accept that top posting is controversial. It's a written standard > at my place of work. I've never seen it as a Big Sin. I'd rather see the > new stuff at the top than wade to the bottom myself.
Written standard eh? That sucks. I blame Outlook. > And if bottom posting is the One True Way, what of interleaving? AFAIK interleaving and bottom posting are the same thing. When you interleave the text you are referring to is always above your comment. This post is interleaved and bottom posted. -- Tracy R Reed http://copilotconsulting.com 1-877-MY-COPILOT -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-newbie
