Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
> 
> However, I will withhold judgement until I get some more  
> information.  John is talking to some SDMUG folks, so I'll wait  
> before kicking off an email.

Unfortuneately, the SDMUG person (singular) I was able to track down
knew nothg yet, was not terribly surprised, but had precious little to
say onteh subject. He is not very active anymore, I am afraid.

> I can certainly seem some reasons for SDMUG to just decide to go it  
> alone.  Money management being a big one.  I imagine that group has  
> quite a wad of cash tucked away.  Usage of that cash probably has  
> strictures with SDCS.

Not really. It's ``their'' money; SDCS is merely holding it for them.

> I would, however, probably request a full accounting of all SDMUG  
> assets to SDCS before the secession.  That is probably required as  
> due diligence for the current board members (including the SDMUG ones).

I do hope that the SDCS board will make that full accounting, and give
them that money. I remember talk similar to that at one point.

-john
-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer

Reply via email to