Lan Barnes said:
> I'll have to assess what I think of all this today. I would be
> grateful
> to the steers of kplug if they could express opinions to guide me (and
> perhaps the other kpluggers on the SDCS board).
>
> In principle I feel:
>
> 1. SDMUG should be encouraged to follow their best interests
They must do what is best for them.
> 2. If SDCS is going to end up being a Kplug-only show, we may want to
> reassess
I'm not sure what there is to reassess. I don't even know what the
current active SIGs are.
> 3. I suspect that SDMUG would be making a tactical error to pull out
> (i.e., that SDCS still provides them with value), but they may have
> wrongs or annoyances that need correcting.
This may have been the plan all along. They seemed to have been upset
that they were beholden to SDCS and thus the takeover. They still have
to make an accounting to SDCS and turn over all their assets if they
secede.
> 4. Even if they pull out, kplug shouldn't do anything percipitous.
I don't think we're likely to do anything preciptious. What were you
forseeing?
--
Neil Schneider pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B 8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who
are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it - Mark Twain
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
