On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Stefan Högberg <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Dear Sirs, > > 1. I think that the English version should use BASIC in captials for the > programming language BASIC ( Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction > Code). > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BASIC > https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/BASIC > I disagree, usually acronyms are not taken very serious, specially when it makes a wording sound, I am sure JAVA meant something to someone, or RUBY. > > 2. If it is possible to create an intermdiate Swedish version of > OpenOffice, only for developers to test, it would be great. > There are nightly builds, but this are not language integrated, this is a very complex step during the release cycle to be done 'on demand'. > > 3. Is it possible to download a .po file for the whole project? > https://translate.apache.org/sv/aoo40/ > Yes pootle can download a zip file of the whole project for offline translations. > > /Stefan (Vicinity) > > P.S. I think this image can be helpful for people that are translationg > terms relating to deck, sidebar and deck tabs. These 'objects' are marked > in the image of OpenOffice writer screenshot. > http://s7.directupload.net/file/u/46963/3gpl93fb_jpg.htm > > My level of involvement in translation will probably decline in a couple > of weeks. Hopefully somebody will be phased in so the work will not halt. > I disagree, is providing any confusing with the generic terminology of 'basic openoffice'. Python, Java, and many other languages are only capitalized not uppercased, including Basic. Also is not providing any additional benefit to the porpouse of identifying and differenciating OpenOffice Basic from Python. OpenOffice Basic is not the same as plain old Basic. Just like VisualBasic. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
