I'd like to unsubscribe to this mailing listThanks

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Langpack & Localization update
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:37:01 +0530







Hi.
Can someone lemme know why my Pootle account has been disabled ?

> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:59:21 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Langpack & Localization update
> 
> Hi all,
> regarding the code is fine for us using ca-XR for Valencian (RACV), we 
> will wait until you give us access to our Pootle files. Please create a 
> Pootle account for us. I state that my contributions are under the 
> Apache 2 license and I will work on ca-XR. My preferred username is Masoret.
> 
> Pau, nice to see you here. I hope you continue the AVL translation.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Vicent
> 
> On 21/04/2014 14:55, Pau Iranzo wrote:
> > Hi Alexandro,
> >
> > Just for your information, after Ubuntu switched to LibreOffice, the
> > Valencian Government started using the LibreOffice ca-valencia translation
> > we're responsible for. At the moment, there was a big issue related to the
> > name to be used for the language. Happily, this is not an issue anymore.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pau
> >
> >
> > 2014-04-21 14:23 GMT+02:00 Alexandro Colorado<[email protected]>:
> >
> >> I was previously involved with the ca-XV and the Valencian government
> >> to push the valencian l10n code for it.
> >>
> >> I remember this process was initially approved, but later decided not
> >> to go forward by the GVA.
> >>
> >> Althought there isn't really much I would like to add to the process
> >> at this time, just want to offer any help on the future.
> >>
> >> On 4/21/14, Pau Iranzo<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> My name is Pau Iranzo and I've been the maintainer of the ca-XV
> >> translation
> >>> until the last version of OOO before it became AOO. I've been following
> >> the
> >>> discussion and I just wanted to mention that I agree on the proposed
> >>> solution: keeping ca-XV for AVL and find a different code for the RACV
> >>> version (ca-XR?).
> >>>
> >>> Regarding working in pootle please create a Pootle account for me. I
> >> state
> >>> that my contributions are under  the Apache 2 license and I will work on
> >>> both ca and ca-XV translations. My preferred username is PauGNU.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Pau
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2014-04-21 0:05 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti<[email protected]>:
> >>>
> >>>> On 20/04/2014 Software Valencià wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> we would like to be supported by OpenOffice so we could save a lot of
> >>>>> work.
> >>>>>
> >>>> No problem! Once we get the things set up (warning: this may take a
> >>>> while,
> >>>> we are about to release version 4.1 -end of April- and we won't do
> >> Pootle
> >>>> updates before release) you will only have to translate, and we'll
> >>>> happily
> >>>> do the rest.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>   Valencian language have to rules (AVL and RACV) as other languages like
> >>>>> Norwegian, Galician, Serbian... To prevent misunderstandings by users
> >> we
> >>>>> suggest you to tag our translation as "Valencian (RACV)" so if other
> >>>>> team want to translate "Valencian (AVL)" they can do it. We will use
> >>>>> "ca-XV" code if it's free, or other like that.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Thanks for this information. I got some further details and indeed I was
> >>>> wrong (sorry, I didn't know about the two variants of Valencian).
> >>>>
> >>>> We have technical limitations that make it necessary to use a kludge
> >>>> since
> >>>> we can't support BCP-47 tags (so to use an example you mentioned: we use
> >>>> "sh" and "sr" for the two variant of Serbian, and they are both wrong,
> >>>> but
> >>>> we must live with it).
> >>>>
> >>>> The current ca-XV is the AVL variant. So, even though it is not
> >>>> maintained
> >>>> at the moment (but it may change soon), we must keep ca-XV for AVL. It's
> >>>> an
> >>>> unofficial code anyway.
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we settle on ca-XR for the "Valencian RACV" translation? I'm totally
> >>>> inventing it, so stop me if it's crazy. Basically, the logic is that due
> >>>> to
> >>>> technical constraints we have to use "ca-" to identify the main ISO
> >>>> language group, "X" to mean that it is our extension, "R" is randomly
> >>>> chosen by me to denote "RACV" and can be changed into anything else if
> >>>> you
> >>>> prefer.
> >>>>
> >>>> This way we keep ca-XV open for AVL and ca-XR (or whatever) for RACV and
> >>>> you can work in parallel. If this can help you, we can initialize ca-XR
> >>>> with the files we have now for ca-XV, even though I assume you will have
> >>>> to
> >>>> adapt a lot of strings (but it may still be useful as a reference).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>   So, can we start to work to be part of next Apache OpenOffice's
> >> release?
> >>>> Let's agree on these details while we finalize the 4.1 release. Then
> >>>> we'll
> >>>> update Pootle as soon as possible and all teams can start working again.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>    Andrea.
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alexandro Colorado
> >> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> >> http://www.openoffice.org
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
> ---
> Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! 
> Antivirus está activa.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

                                                                                
  

Reply via email to