Hoi,
Maybe but there are discussions in parallel and this one affects another.
There obvious parallels and I do not want this to be an excuse.
For the record I am against at approving under the current circumstances.
Thanks,
Gerard
PS Thanks :)
On 7 May 2015 at 10:42, Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7 May 2015, at 09:31, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Everything is nor easy not obvious. ku.wikipedia existed prior to the
> existence of the language committee. Kurdish is a macro language and it
> would not be accepted at this time.
>
> Talk about the tail wagging the dog.
>
> The code “ku" existed for a long time before Wikipedia. It is only SIL
> that re-defined it in Ethnologue and we know SIL isn’t perfect. Same as
> “no" for Norwegian.
>
> Gerard, you are blocking progress on ideological grounds. Where exactly do
> you expect feedback? By what date? In what form?
>
> Happy birthday, by the way. :-) Sorry we are disputing, but I don’t think
> your position on this is wise.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
