moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Often the same thing, Mac. Anybody involved in R&D can tell you about the
> fights over funding.
Only so many tax dollars to go around.
> I was a technical program manager for Rome Air Development Center, which was
> one of the main Air Force research laboratories. Our particular franchise
> was the development of digital cartographic and geodetic data for automated
> guidance systems. A spinoff to civilian use that people here are likely
> familiar with is the geopositioning satellite data.
I worked with NavSat and Sins while serving in the Navy on board a nuclear sub.
> The hype vastly exaggerates a milestone that may indeed prove fruitful in
> the future. It far too early to talk about a cure. Responsible researchers
> have indeed noted that but the sensationalism of the press accounts drowns
> out the cautions.
Exactly the point. The press made leaps that the researches didn't. The media put their
spin on the story but in no way does that point towards a hoax. The finding's were
reported and to me they show promise. Do you believe that the doctor has fudged the
results to gain more funding?
> Mac, you are the one who is slinging around words like charlatan and stupid.
> The "major step" you see appears to me a small milestone on a decades-long
> process that may or may not prove successful in the long run.
Stupid I'm not. I'm asking you a legitimate question. If you can't answer it then say
so.I
am not alone in looking at this as a major breakthrough. You may see it as a small step
But the leaders in this field offer a different opinion. I don't think your
qualifications
nullify their opinion as easy as you believe.
>
>
> Again you are the one using words like quack and witch doctor for the
> researchers. I didn't. Hucksterism of serious research may not always be
> the best way to inform the public. Publication in scientific journals I can
> assure you will be considerably more circumspect.
I was making an analogy. It's obvious that you cannot discuss this issue
intelligently.you
have made some pretty strong statements that you can't back up. you have done this many
times before and my earlier post about you have just been proven by you yourself.
How's the taste of shoe leather?
>
>
> >You may believe in your heart that this is a hoax
> >but the facts are pointing in the opposite direction.
> >...Mac
>
> Perhaps you will share with us your experience, knowledge or informed
> opinion that leads you to the conclusion that a breakthrough has been
> achieved. I recall many, e.g. interferon, monoclonal antibodies, cancer
> vaccines, applications of light and even heat treatment. Numerous research
> efforts are continuing on these and many others.
>From the reports I've seen the combination of the two drugs used together were
>successful.
>From what I remember this was not done before or something to that effect.I have
>personel
knowledge of the research and use of interferon in clinical studies and the use of it
in
combating Hepatitis and MS. The success ratio is slowly improving in both these
instances.
...Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
