moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Exactly the point. The press made leaps that the researches didn't. The
> media >put their spin on the story but in no way does that point towards a hoax.
>
> So the reporters tell a different story than the results of a test would
> support and you see no problem?
>
> That is the problem.
I see a problem and it's not in the reseach nor the media. As with many stories the
mediatends to inject there own words to grab the audience. My problem with the media
regarding this story was that they felt another lead story regarding Web Hubbell was
more
important. It wasn't until later in the day they gave the story the credit it deserved.
>
>
> >The finding's were reported and to me they show promise.
>
> Promise of what? Curing mice?
That's where it starts.
>
>
> The dump is littered with drugs that showed early promise of doing all sorts
> of things.
And people, like me, are alive today due to others that the research led to
wonderfuldiscoveries.
>
>
> Apparently we know now we can cause up to 98% remission of tumors of
> specially-bred mice with certain tumors. As far as I can see that is all we
> know for sure.
98% is quite high for lab results. Should they have done the testing on humans first?
>
>
> >Do you believe that the doctor has fudged the results to gain more funding?
>
> There are cases of fraud in science but I have made no charges. It is you
> who know people are stupid and ignorant and lying. I have to have better
> evidence.
Look in the mirror. You yourself are your own undoing. You have supplied all the
evidence
I need.
>
>
> As far as I know I answered every question posed to the best of my ability.
At least you tried.
>
>
>
>
> The "leaders in this field?" Could you please tell me how you determined
> that all these "leaders in this field" have determined that there is a major
> breakthrough as shown by this set of test results? I don't have the
> information on "leaders in this field." I don't have a comprehensive survey
> of what they think and how they compare the status of these drugs to others
> in research.
I'm going by the interviews done with the NCI and others.
>
>
> Well yes I can see that as long as you find I am stupid and ignorant and
> lying and whatever without knowing anything at all about me that you might
> not think much of anything I write.
You have provided the proof. I know enough about you from your post's to see right
through
you.
>
>
>
> In real live people incidentally other drugs have caused complete remission
> of turmors.
I don't doubt that but I'm sure they started the testing with the mice....Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
