[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Mornin' Kathy, > If there is something then I'm sure it will be used in one form or another >against Clinton. That will a matter for the courts or congress. Alot will depend >on the evidence and how it holds up under scrutiny. >...Mac Hi Mac, Don't you think that might depend partly on whether Starr's Republican friends can be surgically removed? Starr has been very solicitous of such concerns in the past. Best, Terry "Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 moonshine
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
