[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Fri, 20 Mar 1998 17:12:13 -0500 (EST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
>>I think it's obvious that this is the kind of prejudice that
>convinced
>>our forefathers to institute the innocent until proven guilty
>phrasing in
>>the Constitution.
>
>Bill, you can hunt and search, you can use a magnifying glass, you can
>use a
>computer to search it but nowhere in our Constitution is there any
>such
>statement.
>
>The prejudice against a raped woman should be understood in this
>context.
>The rapist's lawyer always attacks the woman ruthlessly as a
>promiscuous,
>vindictive woman. If you go into a case saying every woman who claims
>to be
>raped is lying and that there is always another side, then you should
>most
>certainly not be permitted on a jury, any jury.
>
>My prejudice is for the truth and I deny that every woman asks for it.
> I
>have never and will never claim that women do not at times make
>totally
>false claims and that the truth may be entirely on the other side.
>Best, Terry
>
HI Terry,
LOL....nice speech. <yawn>
Best,
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
