2011/10/29 Antônio <antoniog12...@gmail.com>: >> If you want to propose a change you should at least bring some >> evidence that you are right. Just because people say in an way it does >> not prove it is appropriate way to write it in a formal environment. >> The spoken and formal written language in Brazil differ quite a lot. >> >> The evidence from Marcelo is very strong, if one of the most important >> government websites uses the form "Sítio", it cannot possibly be >> wrong. > > > http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site > > Antônio
In this case, I totally agree with you Antônio. See too: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%ADtio (or http://goo.gl/nr8K1) "Sítio refere-se normalmente a uma propriedade RURAL DE ÁREA MODESTA, freqüentemente usada para lazer ou para lavoura." (adapted to english: Sítio typically refers to a modest farm area, often used for leisure or for farming) So, the writers of Wikipedia failed too? Or don't talk with formality?! :'D -- Silvio Clécio =============================================== Blog - <silvioprog.com.br> Twitter - <twitter.com/silvioprog> Facebook - <facebook.com/silvioprog> LazSolutions - <code.google.com/p/lazsolutions> Lazarus-BR - <groups.google.com.br/group/lazarus-br?hl=pt-BR> =============================================== * Conheça nosso canal IRC sobre Lazarus: #lazarus-br * =============================================== -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
