On 6/19/06, Adam C. (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't agree.
Fair enough
Yes, general thoughts and designs should be cross-platform, or rather, should be platform independent, but once a concept is to be realized and implemented, why not select the platform that best lends itself to the success of the concept, be it Linux or Windows.
Why does it have to be an either or? And what do you mean by platform? Toolkit? Language? Operating system? I may be a Windows/.NET
guy, but I'm happy to concede some ideas are easier/faster/cheaper developed on Linux, and vice versa. Why do we have to live in a vanilla world? Sometimes I like chocolate and sometimes I like strawberry. Sometimes I like both. I don't agree with the philosophy of trying to please everyone just to be nice. Let's do what's best for the success of a given idea.
Have what ever kind of ice cream you want. But be away that some vendors might be selling you pickle ice cream ;) And some of the open source cream might not even come frozen... (trying to be realistic not completely biased) -matt _______________________________________________ Ldsoss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
