On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 09:30, Martin Hejl wrote:
> I'm utterly confused. In the mail you linked to, you wrote:
>
> > 1. Use of evolution as a development model.
> > 2. Tolerance for new ideas and differing opinions.
> > 3. Full control by lead developers of release/branch direction
> > and purpose.
>
> So, when the Bering-uClibc team is using their "Full control of
> release/branch direction and purpose." (by setting their own
> priorities), this is a sign that we want a monolithic development model
> and that we're trying to make Bering-uclibc "win"?
Martin,
I think you're confusing/misinterpreting my statements, or I'm not able
to present logical debate ideas anymore. Maybe I'm just incoherent. :-(
I still believe in the points mentioned above. However, point three has
nothing to do with my proposal. Leaf hasn't had a new branch created in
over two years. Almost everything is Bering-uClibc centric, and some of
the bering-uclibc members see no reason/benefit in new cores/branches.
This is where my proposal came from.
Note: I'll work on responding to the rest of your message.
--
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
