On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 08:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Mike; > > Eric Spakman indeed spoke for the Bering-uClibc team and their decisions. > > He just expressed a view in the discussion
KP, He did, and I expressed mine. > - that's what disscussions are for. True. > If someone will build a new branch like Alpine it would be fine, and may > speed > Bering-uClibc with 2.6 kernel significantly > >From day one the Bering-uClibc crew understood LEAF and branches as a > >win-win > situation, Bering-uClibc very much profited from Jacques Nilo's and Erik > Wolzaks work, Alpine may profit from Bering-uClibc > > What's actually the problem make Alpine a new branch? I think some of the posts in the "2.6.x kernel support?" thread gave Natanael pause. > Mike; in no way it's encouraging if one of the most active LEAF developers > (count cvs commits, count postings on the mail lists, look into the guides) > get's bashed for expressing his (or his team's) opinion!! Eric, I apologize for anything I wrote that may have upset you. It appears I misinterpreted your "we", in posts over the last couple of years, to encompass all of LEAF not just Bering-uClibc. > I agree with you, Luis' mail recently was not as polite as I think mails in > this community have to be, but he apologized quickly. > > Can we all calm down and respect each others work and opinions? KP, I'll try to calm down. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
