My mistake then. Someone on this list said that was the case and it seemed logical to me :)
Michele :) -----Original Message----- From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Reuse abandoned RIN's Michele, I very much doubt it. The RIN is not the key field for a record, it is just a number which has no use in the DB. Each table in the DB, including the one containing the RINs has the first column as the key field, the RINs are in the second column, and play no part in the linking of the tables. Reusing a RIN does not recreate a key field. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
