Mike, That is pretty much what I am politely(?) trying to say.
The powers that be seem to think that there are sufficient controls in place to ensure their data is not corrupted. I am less than convinced. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ Mike Fry <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2013/11/28 01:19, Ron Ferguson wrote: > >> Whilst Family Search is based on user submitted data, with all the problems >> that brings, we can now also amend that data, and with the best will in the >> world I cannot but see how this is not going to worsen the quality of the >> data. > >Don't you think that facilities like this, improperly used, will only add to >the >mess that was the IGI? After all, the FamilySearch database does include a lot >of what was in the IGI. > >-- >Regards, >Mike Fry >Johannesburg (g) > > > >Legacy User Group guidelines: >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on >our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
