I think the advent of event sharing is making us think more carefully about what we are sourcing. I think a halfway house here would be to move the registration index to the marriage notes once it's detail has been superseded, and of course it can still be sourced if necessary.
On 30/03/2014 00:22, Jenny M Benson wrote: > On 29/03/2014 23:53, Michele/Support wrote: >> I might be a little confused since haven't used these particular >> sources but if I had found a record by using an index, once I had the >> record I would delete the index as a source. For example, if I found >> a couple on Ancestry.com in the Mississippi Marriage Index and then I >> wrote off to the county to get the actual record, once I had that >> record that would be my source, not the index. > > I can see the sense of doing that, but I usually like to keep the Index > entry for 2 reasons: firstly because it shows the history of my > researches and how one piece of information led to another, secondly > because the Index entry doesn't necessarily "match" with the subsequent > Source. > > To take my example of a Marriage Index entry and the Parish Register > entry for the same Source, the information necessary to getting a > Marriage Certificate is included in the Index entry. Although I am > unlikely to get a Certificate once I have seen the Parish Register, if I > keep the details of the Index entry, I or someone else can do so > sometime in the future if we wanted to. > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
