On 30/03/2014 08:50, MikeFry wrote:
> On 30 Mar 2014 03:01, David Newton wrote:
>
>> >I think the advent of event sharing is making us think more carefully
>> >about what we are sourcing. I think a halfway house here would be to
>> >move the registration index to the marriage notes once it's detail has
>> >been superseded, and of course it can still be sourced if necessary.
> Or, convert it into a separate, Marriage Event.

I think your and David's ideas are good ones.  I had thought of making
BMD Registrations different Events to the actual BMDs but didn't want to
"lose" them when they were the only dates I had for those Events.
Moving them when they are superseded makes very good sense.

That's one problem dealt with, but I am sure there will be other
occasions when non-applicable Sources get copied to someone sharing an
Event.

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to