On 2015/01/27 05:21 PM, Norma Heaton wrote:

> The numbers I referred to in my query were _ahnentafel_//numbers & generated 
> by
> the report, not Ancestral File numbers, so my mistake in calling them AFN#.  I
> see I also erred in saying that the father’s number was #176, that was 
> wrong.
> He was #146.
>
> To answer your question, Mike, I created an ancestor report with my uncle as 
> the
> first person so he was # 1, his father #2 and mother #3.  The report did
> generate the correct ahnentafel numbers except for the example I gave.  I
> purposely did _not_ include RIN# in the report since it bears no relation to
> relationships.

Assuming this is the Ancestor Book report, I can see when these numbers get
generated: tick Ancestral File Number on the Report Options: Include tab. So,
you were right: they are Ahnentafel numbers.

As for why the children didn't have numbers. The only reason I can see is that
Ahnentafel numbers are are only assigned to  direct line ancestors and then the
number should be half that of the father. So, from Johannes and Maria, the
dircet line of descent is through Sarah.

For the two children you've quoted at the end (171. Angnietjen BOGERT and 176.
Guilliam BOGERRT)  these are NOT the same children as the two at the top of the
list - they have different parents according to the numbers. Looks like you've
got the two children linked to two sets of parents from different generations.

--
Regards,
Mike Fry (Jhb)




Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to