Hi Cathy
I tried what you suggested: creating a another report and not ticking the box for repeating duplicate lines. The result is that Angnietjen and Guilliam still do not have their ahnentafel number displayed next to them in the child’s list. They still appear as before under their own numbers and doubling those numbers sent them to their father and his information was just repeated w/o any children listed. The Jersey Dutch had a lot of intermarriages: Maria Bertholf, the wife of Johannes Bogert is one of 8 children of her father Guilliam Bertholf and there is descent from 4 of his children, 3 in her line( the 3 in question) and one each in her siblings lines. Then, children of 2 of her siblings married each other. All the ahnentafel numbers of the 4 children of her father have numbers less than his and all numbers appear next to their names. It seems that for some reason, the report does not want to enter the ahnentafel number of a child in the child’s list if it is higher than that of their parent. At least that’s the conclusion I am coming to. If this is a bug in Legacy 7.5.0.278, than I may just have to upgrade to Legacy 8, but I’m wondering if it would still occur in the latest version. Norma From: Cathy Pinner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 9:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] ahnentafel numbers on ancestor report Hi Norma, What a wonderfully complex family you have. Now that you've clarified, I suspect you may have found a bug as the report is perhaps only generating the numbers in the child list for one of the lines. I wonder whether the other numbers would be there if you didn't tick Don't repeat duplicate lines? When you do a pedigree chart which also has the ahnentafel numbers, do they all have numbers and get the right numbers? What happens when you use the Don't repeat duplicate lines? This is a difficult problem to test without making a suitable test file. Are some of the people marrying to create the duplicate in different generations down from the common ancestor? With large families you get people of much the same age who are in different generations. I'm much the same age as a number of my first and second cousins once removed. My cousin marriages are in the same generation - so I don't reach a duplicate line until I'm above the point of the family where there is descent from more than one child. I am getting two numbers on the child list. I don't think I have an example of three. Cathy Norma Heaton wrote: Thank you for all your responses. To clarify: Johannes Bogert & Maria Bertholf were the parents of 11 children and I (& my uncle of course) are descended from 3 of them. (There was lot of intermarriage within the Jersey Dutch families). Angnietjen Bogert and Guilliam Bogert are indeed children of Johannes Bogert & Maria Bertholf, they were the 1^st 2 children born to the marriage and Sarah Bogert was the 8^th child, out of a total of 11 children. Using the ahnentafel numbers generated by the ancestor report for my uncle, Sarah Bogert was # 73 and her father Johannes double that number of #146. That fits very nicely. Coming up through another line in the family, Angnietjen Bogert was #171. Doubling that number for her father makes Johannes Bogert #342. And indeed in the report he is #342. I ticked the box to _not_ have the report repeat duplicate lines so when you look at #342, you see the following: *342. JOHANNES BOGERT *(Duplicate. See Person 146 on Page 77) Similarily, coming up another line in the family, Guilliam Bogert was #176. Again, doubling his number makes his father Johannes Bogert #352 and again, when you look at #352 you see the following:*352. JOHANNES BOGERT*(Duplicate. See Person 146 on Page 77) Johannes Bogert is my uncle’s 5^th great-grandfather and his daughter Sarah Bogert, his 4^th great-grandmother through one line. But, Angnietjen Bogert is his 5^th great-grandmother and Guilliam Bogert is his 5^th great-grandfather through their respective lines. I can understand why #342 was chosen for the anhnentafel number for Johannes, because it is the lowest number assigned to him. And I’m OK with the report indicating this is a duplicate line and to see # 146. What I don’t understand is why the ahnentafel numbers for his other 2 children were not printed to the left of their names in the children’s list. Is it because there is a generational issue here? I hope I’ve made what my question/issue/problem clear. Norma Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
