Many thanks Cathy  I will try it
best regards Stan

------ Original Message ------
From: "Cathy Pinner" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 1/10/2015 5:04:03 p.m.
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Descendant Narrative Wording Option

>Stan,
>
>The solution is relatively easy. Don't ignore the Marriage Information
>screen. When someone has a child, obviously there was some form of
>relationship even if fleeting and it's in the "Marriage" Information
>where you control how the situation is reported.
>
>Open the Marriage Information screen for Mary. On the left you will
>find  a checkbox "This couple didn't marry" - check that. That is what
>invokes the non-marriage wordings.
>Then go to the Wording Options tab and put in your alternate wording
>you want if the default isn't what you want. Defaults are set at
>Options - Customise 8.7 The Wording Options tab overrides the defaults.
>
>It can read "Mary had a child."
>
>If you don't want "Unknown" showing on your Family View for the blank
>father, make sure you have Options - Customise - 3.11 checked for "just
>leave blank". This changes it for eve ryone in your file so if you
>still have Unknown showing, it's because you've actually entered that
>yourself (and the person has a RIN which the blank record doesn't
>have).
>
>Cathy
>
>Stan wrote:
>>
>>Thanks Carolyn, This is the first instance though where putting
>>alternative words in the descendant narrative report options has not
>>so far produced an acceptable result. There are other Legacy reports
>>that simply state "xxx had a child" by default, which is what I would
>>like to do. I can easily change the wording in the "marriage" to call
>>it a relationship or other on a case by case basis and do this. My aim
>>is to remove any reference to an unknown father and a "marriage",
>>My Descendant narrative report runs to well over 700 A4 pages. I have
>>macros in Word that do a bit of customisation on a global basis and
>>then create a new PDF, which is how I distribute it
>>I dont want to have to remember to do other changes to individual
>>entries every time I update a listing though. (very frequently)
>>cheers Stan
>>------ Original Message ------
>>From: "CE WOOD" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>To: [email protected]
>><mailto:[email protected]>
>>Sent: 1/10/2015 4:32:26 p.m.
>>Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Descendant Narrative Wording Option
>>>
>>>There is a father; he is unknown. So far, there is no problem. Your
>>>problem seems to be with the wording that calls it a marriage. That
>>>is solved in other ways that other posters can elucidate better than
>>>I.
>>>
>>>If the report will not produce the precise wording that is
>>>acceptable, you need to produce the report in another program, such
>>>as Word. There are options that enable this. Explore them.
>>>
>>>Legacy is not a report program; it is a database program that has
>>>some basic, limited report capabilit ies and accommodates producing
>>>reports in a few other formats in which you can use the verbiage that
>>>you desire.
>>>
>>>
>>>Cheers, Carolyn
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>To: [email protected]
>>><mailto:[email protected]>
>>>Subject: [LegacyUG] Descendant Narrative Wording Option
>>>Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 03:20:09 +0000
>>>
>>>I have a problem that I am sure others have already solved
>>>The scenario
>>>"Mary" at a time of youthful exuberance found herself pregnant at the
>>>age of 16 over 60 years ago. The baby was born and was adopted out to
>>>unknown (at the time ) parents who called her "Jane". The fathers
>>>name was not divulged and did not appear on the birth certificate.
>>>Jane did not have a happy childhood with her adoptive parents, When
>>>she was around 30 she managed to learn of Mary's ide ntity and made
>>>contact
>>>Mary did not marry or have any further children, but is now, in her
>>>70s in close contact with Jane, Jane's husband as well as with Jane's
>>>children and grandchildren. ( her great grandchildren } and all want
>>>them included as her descendants in a descendant narrative report. In
>>>the same vein Jane does not want her adoptive parents identified or
>>>any reference made to them They are both happy with a General Note
>>>appearing on Jane saying she was legally adopted at birth but now is
>>>in close contact with her birth mother Mary
>>>The problem.
>>>Mary and Jane both want no reference to the birth father, They do not
>>>want him recorded as unknown, They do not want any "marriage" event
>>>recorded as a relationship or anything else They just the words "Mary
>>>had a daughter Jane" then continuation with the narrative the same as
>>>usual. Is that too much to ask?
>>>I have tried many things but nothing has wo rked. Removing the
>>>marriage link then just attributing the child to Mary, reinstuted a
>>>"marriage" and unknown father. I had thought that by making the
>>>"Unknown" father "private" as opposed to " invisible" he and the
>>>marriage would be ignored but regrettably that also suppresses Jane
>>>and her descendants
>>>Has anyone already solved this problem??
>>>cheers from Stan in NZ
>>>
>>>
>>>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>>><http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp>
>>>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>>>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>>>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>>Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
>>><http://support.legacyfamilytree.com/>
>>>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
>>>and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>>><http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/>).
>>>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>>><http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>>
>>
>>
>>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
>>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
>>and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com
>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
>and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to