On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Jonathan Harley <j...@spiffymap.net> wrote: >> I've always understood that the intent of the >> ODbL was not to change the spirit of OSM licensing, just to clarify it. > > Whose intent are we talking about, here?
Put another way, feel free to use the content of the people who chose to relicense under the ODbL, as if CC-BY-SA were the ODbL. But for the content of those of us who have *not* chosen to relicense under the ODbL, you need to respect that our intent was to release our work under CC-BY-SA, and not the ODbL. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
