On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Jonathan Harley <j...@spiffymap.net> wrote: > On 03/02/11 10:18, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> >> Jonathan Harley wrote: >>> >>> Making it impossible to make works where not all of the elements >>> are free does nothing to protect the freedom of individuals to use >>> OSM. >> >> That's as may be, but to restate the point made by Frederik, you can't >> simply wish away what the licence _actually_ _says_, simply because you >> disagree with it. > > Like I said, my interpretation of the license - like everyone's - is guided > by what we think the intent of it is.
You can't just make up the intent without any regard to what the license says about what its intent is. "If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one." _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
