On Wednesday 12 November 2008 09:10 am, Edward K. Ream wrote: > People do tend to object to any notion that more people might not be a > good thing. At the same time, they deny the essential aspects of > Malthusian theory. Before you dismiss that theory, you must > understand that denying it implies denying Darwinian evolution, and > denying Darwin's theory marks one as an intellectual incompetent.
Can you elaborate on that a little (that denying Malthusian theory implies denying Darwinian evolution)? (If it's in the next paragraph, I've missed it. ;-) > The essential point is that growth will *inevitably* run up to limits > that will curtail that growth in extremely nasty ways. There is no > way to twist around that inconvenient truth. It is clear to me that > we humans are already *way* past the point of sustainability. The > mass extinction of species caused by habitat destruction is proof > enough. Randy Kramer -- I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video instead.--with apologies to Cicero, et.al. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
