On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:42:51 -0500 "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I vote for pruning rather than new things. > > That's a tough sell. Links by themselves are not bad. Feel free to > ignore whatever you like :-) It's not a problem for me because I already know what's irrelevant. It's the potential new user making a quick assessment to decide if they want to spend more time getting into Leo who might have a problem. > > SF project and External downloads seem to be redundant. Do we really need > > SF? > > Yes, we do need it. All "official" releases get uploaded there. But SF has all sorts of machinery for VCS and bug-tracking and discussion which we're not using, which may lead new users around in frustrating circles, or give the impression nothing's happening. If SF is only being used for official releases, why not just post them on Leo's website? Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
