On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:10:27 -0500 Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, theoretically. In practice Sqlite over XML have proved better > response time in loading and querying when two representation of the > same data are available, at least in my experience. But see my comment re leosax elsewhere - XML loading in not a bottleneck for Leo. At least it shouldn't be / doesn't need to be, I haven't looked at the actual code - I just assume it uses Python's SAX tools. You would expect sqlite to do better with queries on indexed fields, but Leo doesn't query the data, it just loads all of it into Python data structures. If Vitalije is seeing noticeably faster load times loading from sqlite, then that points to a performance boost from sqlite. If not, then the read from disk time is not the issue for Leo. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
