On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:53:04PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes:
> >> > Also drop the now unnecessary ff_h264_ prefix from its name.
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > --- a/libavcodec/h264.c
> >> > +++ b/libavcodec/h264.c
> >> > @@ -4559,7 +4559,7 @@ av_cold void ff_h264_free_context(H264Context *h)
> >> >
> >> > -av_cold int ff_h264_decode_end(AVCodecContext *avctx)
> >> > +static av_cold int decode_end(AVCodecContext *avctx)
> >> 
> >> Please keep the h264 prefix on the name.  Having somewhat unique
> >> function names helps if they show up in a stack trace or someone wants
> >> to set a debugger breakpoint.
> >
> > The problem is that we don't do this consistently anywhere, much less
> > in this file.  Keeping the prefix on a single function looks like an
> > exercise in futility to me.
> 
> Two wrongs do not make a right.  Nor do three wrongs, nor 500 wrongs.
> Even if you only get one lone right, that's still better than none at all.

Two rants don't make a call for action. :)

I've sent an updated patch already, but if you guys are going to insist
on this, I would expect mentioning this topic in reviews, a documentation
update for the new formats checklist and an attempt to fix this throughout
the codebase.

Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to