Again, since you have apparently been unable to understand so far, we do not hate America. Some of us hate the Zionist neocons who have captured "our" government and are leading us into a police state, World War III and a one-world totalitarian government. I suspect that many average Americans who love America would respond quite vigorously to "our" leaders if they knew what was happening. That fact should be immensely encouraging to those of us who are spreading truth and defending liberty and looking forward to the day when the American people become aware of what is being done to them.
For life and liberty, David Macko ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Dondero Rittberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 3:40 PM Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Cindy Sheehan, Libertarian for President? > Why should this be an issue? Why should you be worried that she's > more of a "big government Progressive Democrat?" After all the > Libertarian Left has basically morphed into an arm of the Democrat > Party. There's no distinguishing any more between Leftist America- > hating Libertarians and Leftist America-hating Liberals. They are > one in the same. Where's the difference? When's the last time you > heard a Leftist Libertarian criticizing a Leftist Democrat on > anything? > > > > > --- In [email protected], "terry12622000" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I haven't really looked into it much but from the soundbites I > have >> heard from her it appears she is a big government Progressive > Democrat. >> Of course soundbites can be edited. >> >> Either way I can understand libertarians encouraging her to run > against >> Hillary in the Senate Primary in 2006 and the Democratic > Presidential >> primary in 2008 and maybe even voting for her in the primaries if > a >> libertarian or a close libertarian is not running in the primaries > if >> it would help knock H Clinton out of the >> running. >> Still if it is a close race would any individuals vote > really >> count, would it break a tie. The odds is probally greater on > winning >> the big lottery and getting struck by lighting going to the polls > and >> coming back. >> >> --- In [email protected], "hrearden_hr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> > --- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > >> > > You're correct. She shouldn't run on the Libertarian > ticket. She >> > would be >> > > more appropriately lined up with the Green Party or the > Liberal >> Party. >> > > >> > > David Hughes >> > >> > >> > What do you base that statement on? >> > >> > $ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/VpgUKB/pzNLAA/cUmLAA/KlSolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
