Then by this logical reasoning anarchy is only the absents of a formal state and the (always in each and every case) attendant initiation of force which is the basis and substance of any formal state.
BWS ----- Original Message ----- From: Terry L Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:52 am Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Immigration > Boyd, yes of course; as you said, it's 'self-government' > > -Terry Liberty Parker > Govt is... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/47139 > > > --- In [email protected], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From: Andr? Kenji de Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > 2006/4/13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Wrong again. Anarchy as used in this sense means anarcho- > > > capitalism. Context must be taken into account in human to > human > > > communication. If you take words out of the context in which > they > > > are used you are distorting the meaning of the communicator's > > > statement. > > > > > Anarchy is simply the absence of government. You don´t have to > be > an > > > anarcho-socialist or an anarcho-capitalist to be an anarchist. > > > > > > -- > > > André > > > > And then you get into the various definitions and catagories of > government. If someone self governs themselves is that government? > > > > BWS > > > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
