Re: [Libertarian] Re: Purity

[Cory Nott]

I always ask why as well. It's a fair question and should be asked. However, I don't want to be standing isolated in an ivory tower whilst asking the question. The room tends to echo and the people below are too busy to even hear the question, let alone would bother to answer it.
   
   
   
  
Terry L Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Cory, I think you concede too much ground to authoritarianism!  

I don't care if the person I'm talking politics with is in or or 
nowhere near the LP (church?).  I will STILL ask that person to 
explain why THEY think it's 'OK' to initiate, or do a credible threat 
to initiate, physical force upon an innocent person or their justly 
held possessions; AND insist that they PROVE their point or abandon 
their evil advocacy ('put up or shut up')  

Unless you're Tony Soprano reminding his gang who's boss, burden of 
proof is on the aggression advocate.  


-Terry Liberty Parker 
Please see what I wrote in 
LIMITED vs UNIVERSAL Libertarianism 
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian/message/47412  

  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







ForumWebSiteAt  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian 





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



   Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web. 
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.