immigration. It's not clear enough. It should say, "The Libertarian
Party supports the right of a woman to have an abortion at any time
from conception to birth without any permission, oversight, or
notification of any other person or government" and "The Libertarian
Party recognizes that America was built by immigrants and the fact
that the founders created America to welcome all immigrants from all
nations, so we support the elimination of all immigration laws and of
the INS itself and welcome and unlimited number of immigrants from any
nation on earth to come here to live and work peacefully."
I wouldn't mind eliminating the insane "Cult of the Omnipotent State"
garbage either.
--- In [email protected], "David Macko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have no desire or intention to eliminate the pledge. I support most
> of the platform, with the exceptions of the immigration and abortion
planks.
>
> For life and liberty,
> David Macko
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:15 PM
> Subject: [Libertarian] Re: Badnarik on Immigration
>
>
> I would never support you or anyone else who wants to change the party
> platform or to eliminate our pledge.
>
> Libertarians support unlimited immigration from any nation on earth.
>
> The U.S. government is given no authority over immigration by the
> Constitution.
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "David Macko" <dmacko@> wrote:
> >
> > I plan to attend the National Convention in Portland, Oregon.
> > Does anyone wish to support me in trying to change our National
> > Platform so that it conforms to the sensible policies which are
> > stated below?
> >
> > For life and liberty,
> > David Macko
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <boyd.w.smith@>
> > To: "Golden Triangle Libertarians"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Libertarian
> Enterprise Main"
> > <[email protected]>; "Libertarian Yahoo Group"
> > <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:15 PM
> > Subject: [Libertarian] Badnarik on Immigration
> >
> >
> > > Immigration is among the most contentious issues facing America
> today, and
> > > the specters of terrorism and war have only added fuel to an
> already fiery
> > > debate. Let's take an objective look at immigration, borders and
> > > legitimate national security concerns.
> > >
> > > Coupled with reasonable immigration for the peaceful, we must
> maintain a
> > > vigorous national defense against our enemies.
> > >
> > > Terrorists and criminals who attempt to enter the US via a Customs
> and
> > > Immigration station should be denied entry and, where applicable,
> arrested
> > > and detained or extradited.
> > >
> > > Terrorists and criminals who attempt to enter the US via other
points
> > > along its 95,000 miles of border and coastline should be treated
> as what
> > > they are: invaders against whom we must respond. As long as our
> defense
> > > forces restrain themselves to reasonable rules of engagement,
> doing this
> > > will much better guarantee our security with little risk of dire
> > > consequences to the occasional innocent refugees.
> > >
> > > We must reject the foreign-adventurist concept of national defense
> that
> > > keeps American troops overseas covering for nationalist and
corporate
> > > meddling in the affairs of other nations. A better national
> defense policy
> > > would be one which, lacking any real attack which might require
> > > retaliation elsewhere, focuses on the logical area: the nation's
> borders.
> > >
> > > We must work to either replace or reclassify the Border Patrol and
> treat
> > > border issues as what they are: national defense issues coming
> under the
> > > mission and scope of our defense forces. In an age where the
> equivalent of
> > > a large invasion force can be packed into a suitcase-sized box
> containing
> > > nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, no lesser response will do.
> > >
> > > Immigration and border security are two separate issues.
> > >
> > > When immigration and border security are jumbled together, the
> result is
> > > both deadly to peaceful immigrants and subversive of the security
> of the
> > > United States.
> > >
> > > By any reasonable measure, properly-regulated immigration is not
just
> > > beneficial to the American economy but indispensable to the goal
of a
> > > nation of freedom and opportunity. This nation was built on
> immigration.
> > > Allowing peaceful people to enter our country appropriately is not
> just an
> > > option. It's a benchmark by which we measure whether or not we're
> living
> > > up to the American ideal. Coupled with a benign foreign policy, it
> is what
> > > makes America the beacon of Liberty in what was once and would be
> again an
> > > otherwise dark world for most people.
> > >
> > > This does not mean, however, that the national defense must be
> sacrificed
> > > to some naive conception of "open borders."
> > >
> > > The privilege of entering the United States is not the right to
> invade the
> > > United States in contest with its legitimate interest in securing
> itself
> > > against those who would do it harm.
> > >
> > > Peaceful immigrants should be allowed to enter the US at
conveniently
> > > located Customs and Immigration stations, subject only to brief
> vetting to
> > > ensure that they are not terrorists or criminals, and reasonable
> > > consideration of the nation's ability to assimilate them.
> Unreasonable
> > > restrictions and quotas should not leave potential productive
> citizens
> > > with no options other than to remain destitute elsewhere or to
> place their
> > > lives at risk by attempting to cross the border at remote and
> dangerous
> > > locations; this, often under the guidance of ruthless "coyotes"
> who are as
> > > likely to leave them to die as to get them safely across, and then
> only to
> > > lead embarrassingly criminal lives of fear of detection, detention
> and
> > > deportation.
> > >
> > > Not only is the current border policy not working, it is making
> national
> > > defense a more difficult task. Foreign nationals crossing into
the US
> > > illegally, because they were denied legal entry without good reason,
> > > provide cover, by their sheer numbers, for terrorists and
> criminals. The
> > > black market in smuggling people constitutes a vector for also
> bringing
> > > the nation's enemies into our homeland.
> > >
> > > The welfare state needs to be eliminated whether immigration is an
> issue
> > > or not.
> > >
> > > We should not have to worry about foreigners invading us just so
> they can
> > > eat out our substance on the dole. The possibility of "safety net"
> abuse
> > > is not a good excuse for excluding immigrants. The so-called
> safety net is
> > > not a solution for the plight of poor immigrants, it is one of the
> worst
> > > enticements to illegal trespass by foreign nationals.
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
SPONSORED LINKS
| Libertarian | English language | Political parties |
| Online dictionary | American politics |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
