wear in public. In the NAZI book jews were inferior parasites with
no right to live. In the book of Jim Crow laws blacks were less than
second class citizens. Thank Liberty that one mans book does not
always prevail in forcing his dementions on all the world.
The fact of the matter is that some view a Fetus as inhuman, and
others do not, just as some viewed thouse of african decent and
inhuman and others never did.
I want no federal law banning abortion, but I also want no federal
law defending it, especialy not unconditionaly. The federal
goverment has no place medling in peoples lives Paul, and the only
federal law I could support dealing with Abortion is one that is
strichtly limited to dealing with discrepencies between state laws
regaurding abortions.
To make a firm stand infavor of unrestrichted abortion would be a
real philosophical failure for Libertarianism. It would support
deprive a wronged individual from seeking justice, and that should
be contrary to libertey in any ones book.
--- In [email protected], "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is no such thing as an unborn child or an unbaked cake,
however
> there are fetuses and there is dough.
>
> The man has nothing at all to say about the abortion and neither
does
> any other person, group of people, or government on earth.
>
> In my book, a fetus has no more human life than a brick. You're
free
> to have your own opinion, but neither your opinion, nor mine
matter in
> the slightest. The only person whose opinion matters is the
pregnant
> woman. She has SOLE DOMINION over her body and all organisms
within
> that body. Nobody else on earth has any decision making power over
> whether or not she has an abortion, or any legitimate right to
prevent
> or punish her for having one or even to be notified about one for
that
> matter.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "uncoolrabbit" <uncoolrabbit@>
> wrote:
> >
> > If a husband has no right to be informed of the contract killing
of
> > his unborn child, why should you have any right for reperations
if a
> > member of your family is murdered for profit? Or, do you believe
> > also that manslaughter and hired hitmen are things that should
also
> > be not only legalized, but actualy protected by legislature?
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Paul" <ptireland@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 1. Cult of the omnipotent state makes us all sound insane and
> > we're
> > > not an anarchist organization
> > >
> > > 2. Nobody has a right to be informed if a woman is having an
> > > abortion. Not her parents, her husband, her church, or any
other
> > > person or group of people on earth except for the doctor
performing
> > > the abortion.
> > >
> > > 3. I'd be for eliminating the entire Homeland Security
Department
> > and
> > > all subdepartments within it.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "steven linnabary"
> > > <linnabary51@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Paul" <ptireland@>
> > > >
> > > > > I also slightly disagree with the party platform on
abortion
> > and
> > > > > immigration. It's not clear enough. It should say, "The
> > Libertarian
> > > > > Party supports the right of a woman to have an abortion at
any
> > time
> > > > > from conception to birth without any permission,
oversight, or
> > > > > notification of any other person or government"
> > > >
> > > > I think a husband might have a right to know if his wife is
> > getting an
> > > > abortion. And a religious community that the woman is part
of
> > might
> > > also
> > > > have the same right (in a contractual sense). Afterall, the
> > Roman
> > > Catholic
> > > > Church certainly has the right to excommunicate somebody
that
> > violates a
> > > > major tenet of that faith.
> > > >
> > > > But no government body has the right or privilege to tell
> > somebody
> > > what to
> > > > do with their body (except in an individual contractual
sense,
> > as the
> > > > military might do in wartime).
> > > >
> > > > and "The Libertarian
> > > > > Party recognizes that America was built by immigrants and
the
> > fact
> > > > > that the founders created America to welcome all
immigrants
> > from all
> > > > > nations, so we support the elimination of all immigration
laws
> > and of
> > > > > the INS itself and welcome and unlimited number of
immigrants
> > from any
> > > > > nation on earth to come here to live and work peacefully."
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > INS has been abolished...sort of. It was combined with
Customs
> > into ICE
> > > > (Immigration & Customs Enforcement).
> > > >
> > > > > I wouldn't mind eliminating the insane "Cult of the
Omnipotent
> > State"
> > > > > garbage either.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why should we eliminate what tells the world what we stand
for?
> > > Should we
> > > > only resort to wishy-washy verbiage that means less, and can
be
> > more
> > > easily
> > > > taken out of context?
> > > >
> > > > PEACE
> > > > Steven R. Linnabary, Treasurer
> > > > Franklin County Libertarian Party
> > > > (614) 891-8841
> > > > P.O.Box#115; Blacklick, OH 43004-0115
> > > >
> > > > "When you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make
violent
> > > revolution
> > > > inevitable" John F. Kennedy
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
