it. Both of you have more sense. At least I hope you do. and with the
exeption of one or two of you pieces both of you act like you have good
sense.--- In [email protected], "Thomas L. Knapp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The piece reprinted by Boyd Smith is the position paper from Michael
> Badnarik's 2006 congressional campaign. That, in turn, is a badly
> re-worked version of the position paper from his 2004 presidential
> campaign.
>
> I'd be interested in knowing why Badnarik wanted to weaken his
> position, not to mention screwing up the readability of what was -- or
> at least I thought so when I wrote the final 2004 draft, working with
> some material from (if I recall correctly) Anthony Gregory -- a pretty
> good position paper.
>
> Tom Knapp
>
ForumWebSiteAt http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Libertarian
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Libertarian" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
